Rational
choice theory uses a specific and narrower definition of
"rationality" simply to mean that an individual acts as if
balancing costs against benefits to arrive at action that maximizes personal
advantage.
Thus, "rationality" described by rational choice
theory is different from the colloquial and most philosophical use of the word.
In rational choice theory, all decisions, crazy or sane, are
postulated as mimicking such a "rational" process.
Thus rationality is seen as a property of patterns of
choices, rather than of individual choices: there is nothing irrational in
preferring fish to meat the first time, but there is something irrational in
preferring fish to meat and preferring meat to fish, regularly.
Work done under the rational choice theory paradigm
typically does not investigate the origins, nature, or validity of human motivations
(why we want what we want). Instead, it takes the biological, psychological,
sociological, moral, and ethical roots of behavior and preferences as given and
theorizes with these factors fixed.
Footnote: Some materials is from Wikipedia
Aghanemat Aghayev
No comments:
Post a Comment